Teaching with Integrity 2/24/09

The case of Irene Canebrake and Angela Dormer reminded me of one of our first class lectures regarding the views of a Consequentialist versus a Non-Consequentialist. Ms. Canebrake takes the Consequentialist view on the matter because she simply states that her second grade students cannot learn fractions and their frustration has negatively affected their work in other areas. She states, "I am responsible for the education and the emotional welfare of these children." This statement makes it clear that Ms. Canebrake is more concerned with the well being of her students by not making them master material that was beyond their ability, although fractions were required in the curriculum. Angela Dormer is clearly a Non-Consequentialist. Although she understands where Ms. Canebrake is coming from, she still says she has a duty to enforce the district policy of teaching fractions in 2nd grade.

The question arises of which view equals teaching with integrity? Ms. Canebrake is an experienced teacher and uses her professional knowledge to decide that her students cannot be taught the curriculum of fractions at their age. Although she knows it is required by the district that she do so, she is more concerned with the well being of her students rather than a "rule" that is written on a piece of paper requiring her to teach a particular subject. Although she may not be following the rules, I believe she is taking responsibility for her classroom and students by knowing their abilities and standing up for what she believes in. It takes integrity for a person to speak against something they do not believe in, especially when it is required by your boss and your district.

To truly answer this question, I believe it depends on whether you view things as a Consequentialist or a Non-Consequentialist. Everybody has different views and opinions about particular matters. Parents want their children to be taught by knowledgeable and responsible teachers, and Ms. Canebrake took responsibility by knowing the capabilities of her students and speaking out in their defense.